Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Products Liability Law

Jan 31, 2024

Products liability – Implied warranty

Where the defendant manufacturer of a water-supply line has moved to dismiss a complaint over water damage caused when the line cracked, that motion should be denied as to an implied warranty claim.

Jan 17, 2024

Products liability – Depositions – Protective order

Where a defendant in a suit over a surgical stapler has moved for a protective order to prevent the plaintiffs from deposing two of the defendant’s employees, that motion should be denied despite the defendant’s argument that the depositions would produce irrelevant or duplicative information.

Dec 30, 2023

Products liability – Primary jurisdiction – NHTSA

Where plaintiffs who purchased children’s car seats have moved to amend their complaint, their motion should not be denied on futility grounds despite the defendant’s argument that the National Highway and Traffic Safety Agency has primary jurisdiction.

Dec 7, 2023

Products liability – Vehicle – Defects

Where a defendant auto manufacturer has moved for summary judgment on the claims of a plaintiff who alleges that a vehicle he ordered directly from the manufacturer bore signs of having been driven and damaged, the motion must be denied because a triable issue of fact exists as to whether the vehicle was damaged on delivery.

Nov 21, 2023

Products liability – FHSA – Failure to warn

Where a plaintiff insurance company has brought a subrogation action alleging that a house fire was caused by the spontaneous combustion of a product manufactured by the defendant, a motion for partial summary judgment filed by the defendant should be allowed because spontaneous combustion is not a “principal hazard” subject to mandatory warnings under the Federal Hazardous Substances Act.

Nov 20, 2023

Duty to warn inapplicable to spontaneous combustion

A manufacturer of a product allegedly responsible for a kitchen fire could not be held liable for failing to include a warning about the risk of spontaneous combustion, a U.S. District Court judge has ruled.

Nov 8, 2023

Products liability – New York law – Surgical implant

Where the defendant manufacturer of a surgical implant has moved for summary judgment on a claim asserted by a plaintiff who underwent eye surgery, that motion should be allowed under applicable New York law, as the plaintiff has identified no evidence that creates a triable issue on the question of whether the implant suffered from a defect that was knowable at the time of her surgery in 1986.

Nov 1, 2023

Products liability – Limitations – Discovery rule

Where a defendant manufacturer of a pelvic mesh product has moved for summary judgment, that motion should be allowed under the three-year Massachusetts statute of limitations, as the plaintiff was or should have been on notice, more than three years before filing suit, that she had been harmed and that the defendant was the cause of her harm.

Nov 1, 2023

Products liability – Limitations – Heart valve

Where a complaint was filed in 2023 alleging that a faulty medical device was responsible for a patient’s untimely death, the complaint must be dismissed under the Massachusetts three-year statue of limitations, as the plaintiff was aware of the alleged injury in 2015.

Sep 27, 2023

Products liability – Medical device – Design defect

Where a complaint has been brought against the defendant manufacturer of an inferior vena cava filter surgically implanted in the plaintiff, summary judgment is unwarranted with respect to a design defect claim, as a dispute exists over the availability of a safer alternative design.

Sep 27, 2023

Products liability – Causation – Acid concentrates

Where litigation has been brought over the use of acid concentrates in the treatment of dialysis patients, a motion for summary judgment filed by the defendant manufacturers of the acid concentrates should be allowed based on a lack of evidence of causation.

Sep 14, 2023

Products liability – Limitations – Tolling

Where a motion has been filed to dismiss a product liability complaint, that motion should be allowed because the complaint is untimely and tolling is not warranted under American Pipe & Constr. Co. v. Utah, 414 U.S. 538 (1974).

Verdicts & Settlements

See All Verdicts & Settlements

Opinion Digests

See All Digests