Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Judge Robert E. Toone Jr.

Apr 29, 2026

Criminal – Consent – Indecent assault and battery

Where a jury convicted a defendant of indecent assault and battery, that conviction should be upheld despite the defendant’s contention that the evidence was insufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the victim, having agreed to allow the defendant to give her a tattoo on her front and outer thigh, did not consent to the defendant touching her pubic area and inner thigh of her other l[...]

Carton of Marlboro cigarettes
Mar 26, 2026

Appeals Court reinstates 93A claim against tobacco company

Massachusetts Appeals Court rules Chapter 93A claims don’t require fraud liability, reviving a tobacco wrongful death lawsuit against Philip Morris.

Mar 24, 2026

Securities – Standing

Where claims of conversion, breach of fiduciary duty, negligence and violation of the Uniform Securities Act (G.L.c. 110A) were dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, the judgment of dismissal must be vacated because the plaintiffs' allegations of injury suffice to establish standing.

Site plan of Hull property
Mar 23, 2026

Ruling leaves homeowners separated from beach lot

Massachusetts Appeals Court rules derelict fee statute does not apply to Nantasket Beach dispute, ordering judgment for town on quiet title claim.

Mar 15, 2026

Consumer protection – Cigarettes – Jury instruction

Where a jury returned a verdict for a defendant tobacco company under G.L.c. 93A, a remand must be ordered because the trial judge erred by giving the jury an instruction that effectively precluded a finding of liability under Chapter 93A unless the jury also found liability under the more restrictive standard for fraud and misrepresentation.

Mar 11, 2026

Real property – Derelict fee statute

Where (1) the plaintiff town of Hull commenced an action seeking to establish and quiet title to an undeveloped part of “Beach Avenue” and (2) a judge determined and declared that the defendants hold the fee title to the disputed area pursuant to the derelict fee statute (G.L.c. 183, §58), the judgment must be vacated because the fee was conveyed to another party in 1887, then to the town in [...]

Jan 21, 2026

Criminal – Animal cruelty

Where a defendant was convicted of animal cruelty, the commonwealth did not meet its burden of proving that the defendant unnecessarily failed to provide her dog with proper shelter and protection from the weather, but the evidence did establish beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant unnecessarily failed to provide her with proper food and drink.

Fidelity office building
Oct 27, 2025

Appeals Court upholds division of husband’s closely held securities

The Appeals Court ruled a wife was entitled to half of her husband’s Fidelity equity compensation, rejecting a time-rule formula for dividing complex compensation assets.

Oct 15, 2025

Criminal – Licensure – Joint venture

Where a defendant was charged with carrying a firearm without a license under a joint venture theory, it was error for the trial judge not to instruct the jurors that they needed to find that the coventurer lacked a license in order to convict the defendant.

Oct 15, 2025

Domestic relations – Closely held securities – Modified time rule formula

Where a judgment of divorce nisi has been challenged on appeal, the judgment should be upheld despite the husband’s argument that the Probate & Family Court judge erred by failing to apply the modified time rule formula set forth in Baccanti v. Morton, 434 Mass. 787, 801 (2001), to closely held securities obtained in connection with his employment.

May 20, 2025

Criminal – Firearm possession – Rifle

Where a defendant has challenged his two convictions of unlawful possession of a rifle, the convictions must be reversed because there was no competent evidence that the weapon at issue had a rifled bore.

Golf cart on golf course
Mar 28, 2025

Appeals Court: excess policy covered golf cart injury

Ambiguity in a “follow-form” provision prevented an insurance carrier from enforcing a family member exclusion to bar excess liability coverage of injuries sustained by the daughter of insureds while she was riding in a golf cart, the Appeals Court has ruled.

Verdicts & Settlements

See All Verdicts & Settlements

Opinion Digests

See All Digests