Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Judge Peter B. Krupp

Aug 25, 2025

Employment – Wage Act – ‘Employee’ status

Where a plaintiff has alleged that the defendants violated the Wage Act by failing to pay him the amount specified in a limited liability company’s operating agreement, summary judgment should be denied because there are material disputes of fact as to whether the plaintiff was an “employee” within the meaning of the Wage Act.

Aug 25, 2025

Attorneys – Privilege – Common interest doctrine

Where documents have been withheld based on the attorney-client privilege as extended by the common interest doctrine, the defendants should be ordered to produce communications sent or copied to an attorney for the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, as the defendants have made no argument that HHMI or its attorney were sheltered under the common interest umbrella.

Aug 25, 2025

Tort – Defamation – Conditional privilege

Where a plaintiff whose defamation claim was dismissed based on the conditional privilege for workplace investigations has moved for leave to amend, the motion should be denied as futile because the plaintiff has not alleged facts that plausibly support the notion that the defendants abused the conditional privilege.

Aug 20, 2025

Landlord and tenant – Assignment – Statute of frauds

Where a commercial landlord has challenged the validity of a tenant’s purported lease assignment, there was no written assignment agreement as required by G.L.c. 183, §3, so the landlord is entitled to summary judgment on all of the claims that turn on the validity of the assignment.

Aug 12, 2025

Fraud – False Claims Act – Implied certification

Where the commonwealth has filed a False Claims Act complaint seeking to hold the defendants liable under the notion of an “implied false certification,” there are numerous material disputes of fact that preclude the entry of summary judgment.

Aug 12, 2025

Corporate – In pari delicto doctrine

Where a plaintiff limited liability company has brought suit against its former CEO, the defendant, for allegedly engaging in wrongdoing, the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint should be denied because (1) the plaintiff has introduced evidence that the decision to file the suit was properly ratified and (2) the defendant has not established the affirmative defense of in pari delicto wit[...]

Aug 7, 2025

Civil practice – Excusable neglect

Where a defendant commercial tenant has been awarded summary judgment, a motion by the plaintiff landlord for relief from that judgment should be denied because the motion is untimely and because the landlord has not established excusable neglect.

Aug 6, 2025

Jurisdiction – LLC officers

Where the officers of a limited liability company have filed a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction, that motion should be allowed because the allegations against them reflect only sporadic contact with the commonwealth.

Jul 17, 2025

Corporate – Conversion – Stock

Where a plaintiff has alleged conversion of more than 2 million shares of his vested stock, the defendants’ motion to dismiss on statute of limitations grounds should be denied because issues exist regarding when the alleged conversion occurred and whether the defendants took steps to conceal it.

Jul 16, 2025

Banks and banking – Limitations – Ponzi scheme

Where a plaintiff has alleged that the defendant bank improperly enabled fraudulent transfers of securities owned by the plaintiff’s customers, the bank’s motion to dismiss should be allowed because the plaintiff’s claims are time-barred.

Jul 8, 2025

Insurance – Interpleader

Where (1) insurance proceeds in the amount of $5 million have been tendered in an interpleader action following a shuttle bus accident and (2) 20 of the injured claimants have requested an order for the release of the $5 million according to an allocation formula agreed to by them, that request should be denied as premature because the insureds have not yet had their opportunity to challenge the d[...]

Jul 7, 2025

Civil practice – Costs

Where a plaintiff has moved to amend a judgment to tax costs against the defendant, that motion should be allowed in the amount of $10,907.35.

Verdicts & Settlements

See All Verdicts & Settlements

Opinion Digests

See All Digests