Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Judge Julie Rikelman

Moakley U.S. Courthouse, Boston
Nov 25, 2025

Panel: ‘Heck’ doesn’t bar pretrial probationer’s §1983 claim

The 1st Circuit ruled that pretrial probation without a conviction does not trigger the Heck bar, allowing a Springfield woman’s §1983 excessive force claim to proceed.

Nov 19, 2025

Criminal – Securities fraud

Where a jury found a defendant guilty of securities fraud, his conviction and sentence should be affirmed because (1) any error in admitting evidence summarizing his bank account activity was harmless, (2) sufficient evidence supported the jury’s verdict, (3) the lower court’s loss calculation was fully supported by reliable evidence, and (4) the defendant has failed to show that the restituti[...]

Nov 12, 2025

Civil rights – Arrest – ‘Heck’ bar

Where (1) a plaintiff, following the dismissal of criminal charges against her, filed suit under 42 U.S.C. §1983 alleging excessive force and (2) the defendants moved for summary judgment under Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994), which held that a §1983 claim cannot impugn a valid criminal judgment, the denial of the defendants’ motion should be affirmed because the plaintiff secured a dism[...]

Nov 12, 2025

Appeals – Stay – SNAP

Where a U.S. District Court judge ordered the full payment of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program funds for November, the government’s request for a stay pending appeal should be denied because the government has not made a strong showing that it is likely to succeed on the merits.

A volunteer packs groceries durning an emergency food distribution at the at The Jewish Federation of Greater Philadelphia's Mitzvah Food Program in Philadelphia
Nov 10, 2025

States face uncertainty as Trump administration tries to reverse SNAP food payments

States face confusion as courts and the Trump administration battle over full SNAP payments during the federal government shutdown affecting millions of Americans.

Nov 5, 2025

Tort – SLAPP – Petitioning activity

Where claims of defamation and tortious interference with business relations were brought against two defendants who reported alleged misconduct by the plaintiff nurse to a number of governmental and private organizations, it was not error to deny the defendants’ special motion to dismiss under the Massachusetts anti-SLAPP statute (G.L.c. 231, §59H), as the defendants’ reports to private enti[...]

Oct 28, 2025

Municipal – Substantive due process – Water service

Where a substantive due process claim over a water crisis in a Puerto Rico municipality was dismissed, the district court erred in concluding that the plaintiffs did not plausibly allege conscience-shocking conduct.

Sep 19, 2025

Exclusion of post-arrest statements upheld by 1st Circuit

The 1st Circuit upheld a ruling rejecting a defendant’s post-arrest statements as hearsay in a child sex trafficking prosecution.

Sep 10, 2025

Criminal – Post-arrest interview statements – Hearsay

Where a defendant’s post-arrest interview statements were excluded, there was no abuse of discretion in the lower court’s conclusion that the statements did not come within the excited utterance exception to the rule against hearsay.

Sep 3, 2025

Criminal – Supervised release – Internet access

Where a defendant has challenged two conditions of his supervised release that, taken together, allow him to access the internet only via devices with court-approved monitoring software, the conditions are not invalid despite the defendant’s assertion that they violate his First and Fifth Amendment rights and unlawfully delegate judicial power to the U.S. Probation Office.

Aug 25, 2025

Criminal – Plea – Rule 11

Where a defendant pleaded guilty to two counts of carjacking and one count of possession of a firearm in furtherance of a crime of violence, the defendant’s substantial rights were not affected by a mistake during the change of plea hearing about the duration of the supervised release term for the firearm charge.

Aug 12, 2025

Negligence – Puerto Rico law – Medical malpractice

Where summary judgment was awarded to a defendant physician based on the lower court’s finding that the claims against him were untimely under Puerto Rico law, the judgment should be affirmed despite the plaintiffs’ argument that the burden to prove timeliness never shifted to them.

Verdicts & Settlements

See All Verdicts & Settlements

Opinion Digests

See All Digests