Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Employment

Moakley U.S. Courthouse, Boston
May 23, 2025

1st Circuit reopens $10.2M severance dispute over ambiguity

A $10.2M severance case heads back to U.S. District Court as the 1st Circuit finds ambiguity in a key contract provision.

May 21, 2025

Retirement – Accidental death – Causation

Where a Boston firefighter was diagnosed with hypertension, peripheral vascular disease, and lung cancer, the denial of his widow’s application for accidental death benefits should be affirmed based on a lack of evidence that the firefighter’s retirement and death were the results of the same single work-related cause.

May 21, 2025

Retirement – Criminal conviction – MTRS

Where a petitioner’s membership in the Massachusetts Teachers’ Retirement System was rescinded, that decision should be upheld based on the fact that the petitioner was found guilty of larceny under $250 while working for the Lowell Regional Water Utility prior to being hired as a teacher in Dracut.

May 21, 2025

Retirement – Teacher – Enrollment

Where the Massachusetts Teachers’ Retirement System (MTRS) denied a petitioner’s request to participate in the benefits program known as Retirement Plus, that decision should be upheld because of the petitioner’s failure to file an enrollment document during the first half of 2001.

May 20, 2025

Employment – Vaccination – Undue hardship

Where a religious discrimination complaint was filed after the denial of a plaintiff nurse’s request for a religious exemption from a mandatory COVID-19 vaccination policy, the defendants are entitled to summary judgment because the undisputed facts show that granting the plaintiff an exemption would have caused an undue burden on the defendants.

May 20, 2025

Employment – Retaliation – Accommodation

Where a jury found that a defendant employer retaliated against a plaintiff by terminating him “for requesting or using a reasonable accommodation” in violation of G.L.c. 151B, §4(4), the district court's denial of the employer’s motion seeking judgment as a matter of law should be affirmed, as the record was sufficient to support the jury's conclusion that the plaintiff suffered an adverse[...]

May 19, 2025

Retirement – Accidental disability – Causation

Where the Cambridge Retirement Board denied a petitioner’s application for accidental disability retirement, that decision should be affirmed based on a regional medical panel’s conclusion that the petitioner’s disability was not the result of an aggravation of a workplace injury.

May 19, 2025

Retirement – Purchase of credit

Where the State Board of Retirement denied a petitioner’s request to purchase retirement credit for a five-month period of work in 1981, that decision must be affirmed because the petitioner is no longer publicly employed and he already is receiving a retirement allowance, so he cannot purchase credit for that period now.

May 14, 2025

Contract – Severance agreement – Ambiguity

Where a plaintiff corporation sought reformation of a severance agreement with the defendant, a judgment in favor of the defendant must be vacated and a remand ordered because the lower court incorrectly concluded that the agreement unambiguously promised payments of $680,000 each month for 16 months.

May 12, 2025

Retirement – Group 2 – Correctional employee

Where the State Board of Retirement declined to classify a petitioner in group 2 under G.L.c. 32, §3(2)(g), the petitioner has not carried her burden of proving that she performs eligible work during more than half of her working hours.

May 12, 2025

Retirement – Teacher – Extracurricular club supervision

Where a teacher served as the faculty advisor to a mindfulness and meditation club, it was not error for the Massachusetts Teachers’ Retirement System, in calculating the teacher’s regular compensation for retirement purposes, to exclude the sums she received for supervising the club.

May 12, 2025

Retirement – Accidental disability – Causation

Where the Methuen Retirement Board denied a firefighter’s application to retire for accidental disability, the application should have been allowed because a preponderance of the evidence, including the opinions of a unanimous medical panel, establishes that the petitioner’s incapacity was proximately caused by an incident that preceded his application by less than two years.

Verdicts & Settlements

See All Verdicts & Settlements

Opinion Digests

See All Digests