Criminal – Murder – Home invasion
SJC
Tom Egan//September 12, 2017//
Where two defendants were found guilty of first-degree murder and other offenses related to a home invasion, there is no reversible error despite (1) both defendants’ claim of error in the witness identifications of them as the perpetrators, various evidentiary issues and the prosecutor’s closing argument; (2) one defendant’s challenge of the denial of his motions to sever and for a mistrial; and (3) the other defendant’s challenge of his non-murder sentences.
However, one of the defendants’ convictions of home invasion and armed robbery while masked must be remanded for resentencing based on his status as a juvenile.
Commonwealth v. Wiggins (and 28 companion cases) (Lawyers Weekly No. 10-146-17) (29 pages) (Budd, J.) Pretrial motions to suppress evidence heard by Moriarty, J.; and cases tried before Velis, J., in Superior Court. Alan Jay Black for Maxwell Wiggins Jr.; Jeffrey L. Baler for Swinkels Laporte; Katherine E. McMahon for the commonwealth (Docket No. SJC-10975) (Sept. 6, 2017).
Verdicts & Settlements
- Injury during baby’s adenoidectomy leads to stroke
- Construction worker’s hand caught in cement mixer
- Worker trapped in freezer, dies during steam cleaning
- Pedestrian, 69, hit by motor vehicle while in crosswalk
- Four-vehicle pileup leaves driver with spinal cord injury
- Nursing home staff blamed for kidney-failure death
- Pharmacy’s late delivery blamed for patient’s death
- Man, 25, drowns after swimming lesson at fitness club
Opinion Digests
- Jurisdiction – Forum selection clause – Non-signatory
- Criminal – Responsibility
- Attorneys – Lien
- Landlord and tenant – Default judgment
- Zoning – Constructive grant – Comprehensive permit
- Fraud – False Claims Act – Settlement share
- Civil practice – Discovery – Cybersecurity








