Attorneys – Artificial intelligence – Citations
U.S. District Court
Mass. Lawyers Weekly Staff//January 27, 2026//
Where a show-cause order has been issued to an attorney based on what appeared to be AI-generated citations to nonexistent authority in the plaintiff’s submissions opposing the defendants’ motions to dismiss, the matter should be referred to the state Board of Bar Overseers to impose such discipline, if any, that the board deems appropriate under the circumstances.
“On September 10, 2025, this Court issued an order requiring attorney Roger A. Peace to show cause why he should not be sanctioned or referred to the Massachusetts Board of Bar Overseers. … The Court issued that order after it found what appeared to be AI-generated citations to nonexistent authority in plaintiff’s submissions opposing defendants’ motions to dismiss.
“Attorney Peace responded to the Court’s show-cause order on September 23, 2025. … His response, however, was somewhat less than forthcoming. He asserted that the ‘errors of incorrect case citations arose from a version control mistake,’ and that a ‘first draft with placeholder and unverified citations’ was inadvertently filed as the result of a ‘clerical error.’ … His response did not, however, address whether and to what extent artificial intelligence was used in the preparation of the responses, nor the precise nature of the ‘clerical error’ that led to their inclusion in the relevant submissions.
“The submission of false authority to a court, whether generated by artificial intelligence or not, potentially implicates several rules of professional conduct, including an attorney’s duty of candor. … Therefore, because the Court has now dismissed the action for lack of jurisdiction and failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, it will refer the matter to the Board of Bar Overseers to impose such discipline, if any, that the Board deems appropriate under the circumstances. …”
Kaufman v. Upton, et al. (Lawyers Weekly No. 02-029-26) (2 pages) (Saylor, J.) (Civil Action No. 25-11550-F) (Jan. 21, 2026).
Click here to read the full text of the opinion.
Related Articles
Verdicts & Settlements
- Injury during baby’s adenoidectomy leads to stroke
- Construction worker’s hand caught in cement mixer
- Worker trapped in freezer, dies during steam cleaning
- Pedestrian, 69, hit by motor vehicle while in crosswalk
- Four-vehicle pileup leaves driver with spinal cord injury
- Nursing home staff blamed for kidney-failure death
- Pharmacy’s late delivery blamed for patient’s death
- Man, 25, drowns after swimming lesson at fitness club
Opinion Digests
- Jurisdiction – Forum selection clause – Non-signatory
- Criminal – Responsibility
- Attorneys – Lien
- Landlord and tenant – Default judgment
- Zoning – Constructive grant – Comprehensive permit
- Fraud – False Claims Act – Settlement share
- Civil practice – Discovery – Cybersecurity







