Free Newsletter
Real property – Removal of house
Paul Lamoureux//June 22, 2011//
Listen to this article
Where a judge denied the defendants’ motion for relief from judgment, this was error, as the judgment challenged was improper in ordering a removal of a house which complied with the 2002 Boston zoning code.
Motion denial reversed.
Ruggles, et al. v. Board of Appeal of Boston, et al. (Lawyers Weekly No. 81-828-11) (2 pages) (Appeals Court – Unpublished) (No. 10-P-831) (June 22, 2011).
Verdicts & Settlements
- Injury during baby’s adenoidectomy leads to stroke
- Construction worker’s hand caught in cement mixer
- Worker trapped in freezer, dies during steam cleaning
- Pedestrian, 69, hit by motor vehicle while in crosswalk
- Four-vehicle pileup leaves driver with spinal cord injury
- Nursing home staff blamed for kidney-failure death
- Pharmacy’s late delivery blamed for patient’s death
- Man, 25, drowns after swimming lesson at fitness club
Opinion Digests
- Jurisdiction – Forum selection clause – Non-signatory
- Criminal – Responsibility
- Attorneys – Lien
- Landlord and tenant – Default judgment
- Zoning – Constructive grant – Comprehensive permit
- Fraud – False Claims Act – Settlement share
- Civil practice – Discovery – Cybersecurity
