Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Effectiveness of counsel

Dec 23, 2024

Criminal – Effectiveness of counsel – Racial bias

Where a defendant moved to withdraw his guilty pleas due to ineffective assistance of counsel premised upon his plea counsel's bias against African-Americans, a judge’s decision to deny that motion must be reversed because the defendant showed bias on the part of plea counsel that necessarily infected his representation of the defendant.

Dec 11, 2024

Habeas corpus – Plea bargain – Ineffective assistance

Where a petitioner filed a motion to vacate, set aside or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. §2255, that motion should be denied because counsel’s representation was not constitutionally deficient.

Sep 12, 2024

Immigration – Coram nobis – Effectiveness of counsel

Where a petitioner has asked for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate his 1981 criminal convictions, the petitioner has not demonstrated that there was a fundamental error in his underlying criminal proceeding, so his request must be denied.

Jul 17, 2024

Criminal – Ineffective assistance – Guilty plea

Where a defendant who pleaded guilty to possession of cocaine with the intent to distribute later moved to vacate that plea, a remand is necessary because the defendant has raised a “substantial issue” regarding whether his counsel was ineffective for failing to bring a motion to suppress the cocaine seized during an inventory search.

Jul 12, 2024

Criminal – Conflict of interest – Murder

Where a defendant convicted of first-degree murder was granted a new trial, there was no error of law or abuse of discretion in the judge's conclusion that the defendant’s trial counsel labored under an actual conflict of interest in representing the defendant.

May 29, 2024

Juvenile – Plea – Immigration consequences

Where a Brazilian citizen who pleaded to being adjudicated a youthful offender filed a motion to withdraw his plea on the ground that his counsel had not provided him adequate advice about the immigration consequences of the plea, a Juvenile Court judge’s decision to deny that motion should be affirmed because the juvenile is unable to demonstrate prejudice from any inadequate advice given by pl[...]

May 22, 2024

Parent and child – Termination – Ineffective assistance

Where a father’s parental rights were terminated, a new trial is warranted because the father was entitled to competent representation to assist him in presenting his case.

May 9, 2024

Criminal – Ineffective assistance

Where a defendant was convicted by a District Court jury of indecent assault and battery on a person over 14, he must be granted a new trial because of the cumulative effect of trial counsel's errors.

Apr 30, 2024

Habeas corpus – Ineffective assistance – Inculpatory statements

Where a petitioner found guilty by a jury of carjacking and murdering an undercover police officer sought habeas relief claiming that his trial attorney unreasonably failed to seek exclusion of inculpatory statements he made during a period of improper delay following his arrest and detention, the admission at trial of one of the two contested sets of statements was improper, but the petitioner ha[...]

Apr 9, 2024

Habeas corpus – Effectiveness of counsel – Murder

Where a petitioner convicted of first-degree murder has requested habeas corpus relief, the petition should be denied despite the petitioner’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel and actual innocence based on newly discovered evidence.

Mar 25, 2024

Criminal – Murder – Effectiveness of counsel

Where a defendant convicted of first-degree murder moved for a new trial, it was not an abuse of discretion to deny that motion despite the defendant’s claims of incompetency and ineffective assistance of counsel.

Mar 19, 2024

Criminal – Effectiveness of counsel – Cellphone expert

Where a defendant was convicted of first-degree murder, her trial counsel’s decision not to call a cellphone expert was not ineffective, as (1) that decision was not manifestly unreasonable at the time it was made and (2) the evidence would not have affected the jury's conclusion.