Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Civil rights law

Sen. Cindy Friedman, flanked by Rep. Andy Vargas (left) and Sen. Pavel Payano, speaks to reporters
Jul 29, 2026

Lawmakers reach deal on immigration bill that restricts ICE activities

Massachusetts lawmakers unveiled a compromise immigration bill expanding limits on ICE arrests at sensitive locations while preserving a DOC partnership.

Jul 23, 2026

Education – Parental objection – Kindergarten curriculum

Where a plaintiff has objected to the content of certain books concerning sexual orientation and gender identity that are included in the kindergarten curriculum being used to teach his 5-year-old son, a motion by the defendants to dismiss the complaint should be allowed in part and denied in part.

Cellphone in person's hand
Jul 20, 2026

Criminal defense bar: SJC’s digital forensics case a win for truth

The Supreme Judicial Court ruled Chapter 278A allows post-conviction digital forensic analysis of cellphones, expanding access to evidence.

Judge Rya W. Zobel
Jul 15, 2026

Judge Rya Zobel more than just a trailblazer, members of bar say

Rya W. Zobel, Massachusetts' first female federal judge, is remembered for her fairness, landmark rulings, mentorship and lasting impact on the law.

The Most Important Opinions, January - June 2026
Jul 15, 2026

The Most Important Opinions, January – June 2026

This special feature contains summaries of hundreds of the most notable opinions that were published in Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly in the first half of 2026.

The Souza-Baranowski Correctional Center in Lancaster
Jul 14, 2026

Souza-Baranowski correction officers indicted for allegedly beating prisoners

Attorney General Andrea J. Campbell indicted correction officers at Souza-Baranowski for allegedly beating shackled prisoners after a violent 2024 attack.

Jul 13, 2026

Civil rights – ‘Monell’ liability – Vacated convictions

Where a defendant city has moved to dismiss a complaint filed by a plaintiff whose criminal convictions were vacated, that motion should be allowed as to a negligence count but otherwise denied, as the plaintiff’s allegations are sufficient to state a claim under Monell v. Dep’t of Soc. Servs. of City of New York, 436 U.S. 658 (1978).

Jul 13, 2026

Tort – Civil conspiracy

Where a jury found in favor of the plaintiffs on their claims for defamation, civil conspiracy and violations of their rights under the Massachusetts Civil Rights Act, the defendants’ motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict should have been allowed with respect to the claim for civil conspiracy, as the trial judge’s jury instructions erroneously tied the verdict on the conspiracy claim[...]

DraftEngine, a legal forms platform designed to help civil litigation firms reduce repetitive administrative work and speed up case processing
Jul 13, 2026

Gemini Legal launches DraftEngine for civil litigation forms

Gemini Legal introduces DraftEngine, a platform to streamline civil litigation forms with over 5,000 updated California court forms.

US Immigration and Customs Enforcement logo on document
Jul 10, 2026

Judge orders sheriffs’ ICE records released under public records law

A Superior Court judge ordered county sheriffs to release ICE-related records, finding federal regulations do not shield them from state public records law.

Jul 9, 2026

Civil rights – Church-autonomy doctrine – Medication policy

Where two plaintiffs have alleged that the defendant maintains a policy at its “Adult Rehabilitation Centers” (ARCs) that prevents individuals with opioid-use disorder from accessing medication for their disorder, the defendant’s motion for summary judgment should be allowed on the ground that its medication policy is a matter of church doctrine protected by the First Amendment.

Jun 29, 2026

Prisons – Contraband – Book

Where a plaintiff has alleged that the defendants violated his constitutional rights by prohibiting him from possessing a book that they determined to be contraband, an order granting the defendants judgment on the pleadings must be vacated because it is plausible that the defendants' ban of the book was not pursuant to legitimate penological interests.