Home / Judicial Profiles / SAYLOR IV, F. DENNIS

SAYLOR IV, F. DENNIS

SAYLOR IV

U.S. District Court

U.S. Courthouse
One Courthouse Way
Boston, MA 02210

Phone: (617) 748-9152


Judicial Biography

Born:

1955

Year admitted to bar:

1981

Year appointed/elected:

2004, by President George W. Bush

Background

Education:

Harvard Law School, 1981
Northwestern University, 1977

Publications:

Co-author, “Putting a Square Peg in a Round Hole: The Application of Model Rule 4.2 to Federal Prosecutors,” 53 U. Pitt. L. Rev. 458 (1992);
Author, “Prosecutors and the ABA,” ABA Advisory Committee on the Prosecution Function (1992);
Author, “An Overview of Model Rule 3.8(f) and Attorney Subpoenas,” U.S. Department of Justice (internal manual) (1992).

Participation as a Faculty Member or Lecturer:

Lecturer, Massachusetts Continuing Legal Education;
Lecturer, Boston Bar Association;
Lecturer, American Bar Association.

Professional

Legal Employment History:

Partner, Goodwin Procter (1993-2004);
Special counsel and chief of staff to the assistant attorney general, U.S. Department of Justice, Criminal Division, Washington, D.C. (1990-1993);
Assistant U.S. attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Massachusetts (1987-1990);
Associate, Goodwin, Procter & Hoar.

General Character of Law Practice Prior to Judgeship:

“White collar criminal defense, corporate internal investigations and complex business and financial litigation”

Civic and Community Activities

Honors:

Edmund Jennings Randolph Award, U.S. Department of Justice (1993).

Memberships/Affiliations:

Massachusetts Bar Association;
Boston Bar Association;
American Bar Association.

  • Reported Decisions
  • Other Links

Evaluations from Lawyers

4 = Excellent   3 = Good   2 = Fair   1 = Poor
  rating averages for judges of this court averages of all judges
Manages court time in a way that minimizes waiting around: 4.0 3.5 3.0
Is receptive to requests for continuances: 4.0 2.3 2.9
Is receptive to lawyers’ requests for jury instructions and voir dire questions: 4.0 3.1 3.1
Presents easy-to-follow and legally sound instructions to jury: 4.0 3.2 3.2
Gives lawyers an opportunity to be heard prior to making legal findings and rulings: 4.0 3.2 3.1
Explains decisions in a manner that is clear to litigants and jurors: 4.0 3.2 3.0
Addresses the following with respect      
a) litigants and witnesses: 4.0 3.4 3.2
b) lawyers: 4.0 3.2 3.0
c) court staff: 4.0 3.6 3.5
Attentiveness: 4.0 3.6 3.2
Timeliness of orders, judgments and decisions: 3.0 3.4 3.2
Demonstrates knowledge of substantive law and rules of evidence: 4.0 3.1 3.0
Quality of written decisions: 4.0 3.3 2.9
Shows willingness to ignore      
a) irrelevant considerations: 4.0 3.1 2.9
c) identity of lawyers or parties: 4.0 3.1 3.0
d) public pressure or outside interests: 4.0 3.4 3.2
Has ability to maintain control of courtroom: 4.0 3.6 3.4
Starts session on schedule and on time: 4.0 3.5 3.2
Shows an appropriate degree of preparedness: 4.0 3.3 3.1
Average Overall Rating: 3.9 3.3 3.1

 

  % Yes Answer averages for judges of this court averages of all judges
Regularly keeps sessions past 4 p.m.: 100 22 26
Allows lawyers to lobby their cases in chambers: 0 10 47
Is rigid follower of court-mandated time standards: 0 76 45
Behaves differently when cameras are in the courtroom: 0 50 24

 

Comments

1) Be well prepared. Be civil to brother or sister counsel (and to the Court of course). Recognize the weaknesses of your case and be prepared to deal with them because Judge Saylor will have identified them and will expect you to address them. When trying before a jury, do not attempt to play the stalling game because you want to keep the witness on the stand until the next day. The courtroom has a number of technological bells and whistles that can be used. Practice with them before it is showtime because he will not allow you to waste the time of the court or the jury as you familiarize yourself.

2) Judge Saylor is intelligent, patient, yet decisive and a trial lawyers judge. He is always willing to allow counsel to make his or her argument and listens attentively. He is not afraid to identify areas with which he is unfamiliar and be educated by the parties counsel. He is also not afraid to alter his position if convinced by counsels argument. He is a hard worker and very attentive to the imposition that jury service places upon jurors. He is a terrific judge.



Leave a Reply