Home / Judicial Profiles / Rufo, Robert C.

Rufo, Robert C.

Rufo

Judge

Superior Court

Superior Court Administrative Office
Three Pemberton Square
Boston, MA 02108

Phone: (617) 557-1000


Judicial Biography

Born:

1950

Year admitted to bar:

1975

Year appointed/elected:

2004, by Gov. Mitt Romney

Bench Service:

Superior Court, 2004-
West Roxbury District Court, 1997-2004
District Court (Circuit Judge), 1996-1997

Background

Education:

Suffolk University Law School, 1975
Boston College School of Management, 1972
John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, master’s in public administration, 1991

Participation as a Faculty Member or Lecturer:

Adjunct faculty, Suffolk University Law School (1980-present);
Adjunct faculty, New England School of Law (1994-present);
Adjunct faculty, Emerson College (1993-1994).

Professional

Legal Employment History:

Sheriff, Suffolk County (1987-1996);
Special sheriff/department legal counsel, Suffolk County Sheriff’s Department (1977-1986);
Private practice, Waltham (1975-1977).

  • Reported Decisions
  • Other Links

Evaluations from Lawyers

4 = Excellent   3 = Good   2 = Fair   1 = Poor
  rating averages for judges of this court averages of all judges
Manages court time in a way that minimizes waiting around: 2.8 3.2 3.0
Is receptive to requests for continuances: 3.0 2.9 2.9
Is receptive to lawyers’ requests for jury instructions and voir dire questions: 4.0 3.2 3.1
Presents easy-to-follow and legally sound instructions to jury: 4.0 3.3 3.2
Gives lawyers an opportunity to be heard prior to making legal findings and rulings: 3.0 3.2 3.1
Explains decisions in a manner that is clear to litigants and jurors: 3.0 3.2 3.0
Addresses the following with respect      
a) litigants and witnesses: 4.0 3.4 3.2
b) lawyers: 2.5 3.2 3.0
c) court staff: 4.0 3.6 3.5
Attentiveness: 3.3 3.4 3.2
Timeliness of orders, judgments and decisions: 3.3 3.2 3.2
Demonstrates knowledge of substantive law and rules of evidence: 2.8 3.0 3.0
Quality of written decisions: 2.5 2.8 2.9
Shows willingness to ignore      
a) irrelevant considerations: 4.0 3.0 2.9
c) identity of lawyers or parties: 2.0 3.3 3.0
d) public pressure or outside interests: 0.0 3.4 3.2
Has ability to maintain control of courtroom: 3.2 3.5 3.4
Starts session on schedule and on time: 3.4 3.4 3.2
Shows an appropriate degree of preparedness: 3.0 3.2 3.1
Average Overall Rating: 3.0 3.2 3.1

 

  % Yes Answer averages for judges of this court averages of all judges
Regularly keeps sessions past 4 p.m.: 0 23 26
Allows lawyers to lobby their cases in chambers: 100 47 47
Is rigid follower of court-mandated time standards: 0 39 45
Behaves differently when cameras are in the courtroom: 0 21 24

 

Comments

1) Have a thorough knowledge of the cases you are citing (and even a few related cases you might not cite) in your argument; he will.



Leave a Reply