Home / Judicial Profiles / Grabau, Charles M. (Retired)

Grabau, Charles M. (Retired)

Grabau

Superior Court

Three Pemberton Square
Boston, MA 02108

Phone: (617) 788-8130


Judicial Biography

Born:

May 4, 1948, Newton

Year admitted to bar:

1974

Year appointed/elected:

1985, by Gov. Michael S. Dukakis

Bench Service:

Boston Municipal Court (1979-1985).

Pet Peeves

What displeases me the most is:

“The declining ethics in the profession.”

Background

Education:

The National Law Center, George Washington University, 1973
Tufts University, 1970

Publications:

Author, “Language Barriers in our Trial Courts: The Use of Court Interpreters in Massachusetts,” Massachusetts Law Review (Fall 1985).

Participation as a Faculty Member or Lecturer:

Adjunct professor, Boston University School of Law;
Lecturer, Law and Justice Program, University of Massachusetts;
Lecturer, International Institute of Buffalo, N.Y, addressing the judges of the Eighth Judicial District of New York (Oct. 20, 1994); Lecturer, Massachusetts Association of Trial Attorneys (Oct. 21, 1994);
Faculty, First National Conference on Eliminating Racial and Ethnic Bias in the Courts.

Professional

Legal Employment History:

Partner, Shalhoub & Grabau (1978-1979);
Law Offices of Charles M. Grabau (1977);
Boston Legal Aid Society (1973-1974);
Mass. Defenders Committee (1974-1976).

General Character of Law Practice Prior to Judgeship:

“General practice. Because of knowledge of Spanish, most clients were Hispanic. A great deal of work involved trial practice (criminal) in the Superior Court.”

Civic and Community Activities

Appointive or Elective Positions Held:

Member, Gender Equality Committee of the Superior Court;
Member, Trial Court Committee on Interpreters;
Member, Law Clerks Committee of the Superior Court.

Memberships/Affiliations:

Hispanic National Bar Association;
Massachusetts Judges Conference;
Tufts University Alumni Council;
National Center For State Courts.

  • Reported Decisions
  • Other Links

Evaluations from Lawyers

4 = Excellent   3 = Good   2 = Fair   1 = Poor
  rating averages for judges of this court averages of all judges
Manages court time in a way that minimizes waiting around: 2.5 3.2 3.0
Is receptive to requests for continuances: 1.0 2.9 2.9
Is receptive to lawyers’ requests for jury instructions and voir dire questions: 1.0 3.2 3.1
Presents easy-to-follow and legally sound instructions to jury: 1.0 3.3 3.2
Gives lawyers an opportunity to be heard prior to making legal findings and rulings: 2.5 3.2 3.1
Explains decisions in a manner that is clear to litigants and jurors: 1.0 3.2 3.0
Addresses the following with respect      
a) litigants and witnesses: 1.0 3.4 3.2
b) lawyers: 2.5 3.2 3.0
c) court staff: 2.5 3.6 3.5
Attentiveness: 2.5 3.4 3.2
Timeliness of orders, judgments and decisions: 1.0 3.2 3.2
Demonstrates knowledge of substantive law and rules of evidence: 2.5 3.0 3.0
Quality of written decisions: 1.0 2.8 2.9
Shows willingness to ignore      
a) irrelevant considerations: 1.0 3.0 2.9
c) identity of lawyers or parties: 1.0 3.3 3.0
d) public pressure or outside interests: 1.0 3.4 3.2
Has ability to maintain control of courtroom: 1.0 3.5 3.4
Starts session on schedule and on time: 2.0 3.4 3.2
Shows an appropriate degree of preparedness: 2.5 3.2 3.1
Average Overall Rating: 1.6 3.2 3.1

 

  % Yes Answer averages for judges of this court averages of all judges
Regularly keeps sessions past 4 p.m.: 0 23 26
Allows lawyers to lobby their cases in chambers: 0 47 47
Is rigid follower of court-mandated time standards: 0 39 45
Behaves differently when cameras are in the courtroom: 100 21 24

 

Comments

1) Relax, this one is okay.

2) I never go to court
there were about 8 motions on” that p.m. Not only had he read the briefs, he had read the depos.
Showed professionalism & understanding. A gem!



Leave a Reply