Home / Judicial Profiles / Gants, Ralph D. (deceased)

Gants, Ralph D. (deceased)

Gants

Image credit: Massachusetts Court System

Chief Justice

Supreme Judicial Court

John Adams Courthouse
One Pemberton Square, Suite 2500
Boston, MA 02108

Phone: (617) 788-8130


Judicial Biography

Born:

1954, New Rochelle, N.Y.

Year admitted to bar:

1987

Year appointed/elected:

2009; Became chief justice in 2014; Appointed and elevated, by Gov. Deval L. Patrick

Bench Service:

Superior Court (1997-2008)

Background

Education:

Harvard Law School, 1980
Harvard College, 1976
Cambridge University, diplomate in criminology, 1977

Participation as a Faculty Member or Lecturer:

Lecturer, Harvard Law School.

Professional

Legal Employment History:

Counsel and partner, Palmer & Dodge (1991-1997);
Assistant U.S. attorney (1983-1991) (chief, Public Corruption Division, 1988-1991);
Special assistant, Federal Bureau of Investigation Director William H. Webster (1981-1983);
Law clerk, U.S. District Court Judge Eugene Nickerson, Eastern District of New York (1980-1981).

  • Reported Decisions
  • Other Links

Evaluations from Lawyers

4 = Excellent   3 = Good   2 = Fair   1 = Poor
  rating averages for judges of this court averages of all judges
Manages court time in a way that minimizes waiting around: 3.6 3.6 3.0
Is receptive to requests for continuances: 3.6 3.3 2.9
Is receptive to lawyers’ requests for jury instructions and voir dire questions: 3.5 3.5 3.1
Presents easy-to-follow and legally sound instructions to jury: 3.0 2.7 3.2
Gives lawyers an opportunity to be heard prior to making legal findings and rulings: 3.2 2.9 3.1
Explains decisions in a manner that is clear to litigants and jurors: 3.3 2.9 3.0
Addresses the following with respect      
a) litigants and witnesses: 4.0 3.5 3.2
b) lawyers: 3.7 3.4 3.0
c) court staff: 3.9 3.6 3.5
Attentiveness: 3.2 3.0 3.2
Timeliness of orders, judgments and decisions: 3.9 3.7 3.2
Demonstrates knowledge of substantive law and rules of evidence: 3.3 3.5 3.0
Quality of written decisions: 3.2 2.8 2.9
Shows willingness to ignore      
a) irrelevant considerations: 2.9 2.4 2.9
c) identity of lawyers or parties: 3.4 3.3 3.0
d) public pressure or outside interests: 3.3 2.3 3.2
Has ability to maintain control of courtroom: 3.8 3.5 3.4
Starts session on schedule and on time: 3.5 3.6 3.2
Shows an appropriate degree of preparedness: 3.0 3.1 3.1
Average Overall Rating: 3.4 3.2 3.1

 

  % Yes Answer averages for judges of this court averages of all judges
Regularly keeps sessions past 4 p.m.: 0 14 26
Allows lawyers to lobby their cases in chambers: 50 29 47
Is rigid follower of court-mandated time standards: 0 22 45
Behaves differently when cameras are in the courtroom: 0 0 24

 

Comments

1) Show the judge youre working with him to resolve the dispute before him, but expect the unexpexted on occasion.

2) Tremendously conscientious. Demonstrates profound respect for the law and his judicial responsibilities, and for improving the workings of the trial court and the administration of justice. Sometimes goes off on tangents in deciding cases, so that while the judges knowledge of the law is excellent, his rulings are sometimes surprising. If he gets an idea in his head about a case, its hard to change it.

3) Judge Gants is clearly very capable but devotes his attention to cases that draw his personal interest. When he draws a case which, in his view, does not merit his attention, he fails to prepare, ignores governing precedent, and applies facile reasoning to dispatch the case.

4) Be very knowledgeable on the rules, law etc… go prepared to defend your position in court.

5) Probably the smartest judge in the Superior Court. He personifies intellectualism but not in an off putting manner. He has rigorous expectations of counsel including being succinct and respectful of court time.

6) Go well prepared. Judge Gants will most likely have read the papers. Prepare to argue on policy or fairness grounds if your position is not crystal clear on the law or procedure.

7) Judge Gants is a smart and dedicate judge who listens intently to the arguments and presentations before him. Sometimes I feel as though Judge Gants disregards the law or procedural steps in order to achieve what he thinks is “fair.”

8) Dont waste time on arguments or briefs that dont pass the “laugh test”
Judge Gants will entertain serious papers but is not afraid to reprimand a lawyers if an argument is not well grounded in the law.

9) Judge Gants is an outstanding jurist who is not afraid of dealing with
dispositive motions in order to move a complex case along. He has been thoroughly prepared and has read lengthy briefs (in our case both a motion to dismiss and later a motion for summary judgment)
before conducting hearings. He is smart, respectful.

10) Focus on the interesting legal issues.

11) Committed to understanding the law, extremely well prepared. Too liberal on evidence and lawyers digressions.

12) Be prepared with legal arguments and understand facts of case. Judge reviews papers before hearings.

13) Judge is very intelligent and attentive to details. Runs motion hearings and other matters effectively and with proper attention to legal arguments. Allows attorneys time and opportunity to respond to questions and concerns regarding issues in the case. Case has not come to trial yet so comment on some questions above is not appropriate at this time, but this Judge has an excellent courtroom demeanor.

14) Be prepared for questions.
Answer questions

15) Finest judge in superior court



Leave a Reply