Home / Judicial Profiles / Ford, Daniel A. (retired)

Ford, Daniel A. (retired)

Ford

Image credit: Merrill Shea

Judge

Superior Court

Three Pemberton Square
Boston, MA 02108

Phone: (617) 788-8130


Judicial Biography

Born:

Aug. 8, 1949, Pittsfield

Year admitted to bar:

1974

Year appointed/elected:

1989, by Gov. Michael S. Dukakis

Bench Service:

Superior Court, 1989-2019

Pet Peeves

Other than being well prepared, I look for the following attributes in an attorney appearing before me:

“Politeness to the court and to other counsel. Honesty and frankness with the court.”

What displeases me the most is:

“Unfounded accusations of impropriety made against other counsel. Duplicity.”

Background

Education:

Boston College Law School, 1974
University of Notre Dame, 1971

Participation as a Faculty Member or Lecturer:

Lecturer, Harvard Law School Trial Advocacy Program;
Lecturer, MCLE.

Professional

Legal Employment History:

Partner, Cain, Hibbard, Myers & Cook (1987-1989);
First assistant district attorney, Berkshire County (1979-1987);
Associate, Katz & Lapointe (1975-1979).

General Character of Law Practice Prior to Judgeship:

Criminal prosecution. General practice, with emphasis on civil litigation.

Civic and Community Activities

Appointive or Elective Positions Held:

Chairman, Pittsfield Traffic Commission, appointed (1975-1978).

Memberships/Affiliations:

Board of Trustees, Hancock Shaker Village, Inc. (1983-1995);
Notre Dame Club of the Berkshires (1975-1995);
Board of Directors, Pittsfield Community Music School, Board of Directors (1986-1987).

  • Reported Decisions
  • Other Links

Evaluations from Lawyers

4 = Excellent   3 = Good   2 = Fair   1 = Poor
  rating averages for judges of this court averages of all judges
Manages court time in a way that minimizes waiting around: 3.5 3.2 3.0
Is receptive to requests for continuances: 2.0 2.9 2.9
Is receptive to lawyers’ requests for jury instructions and voir dire questions: 2.9 3.2 3.1
Presents easy-to-follow and legally sound instructions to jury: 3.3 3.3 3.2
Gives lawyers an opportunity to be heard prior to making legal findings and rulings: 3.3 3.2 3.1
Explains decisions in a manner that is clear to litigants and jurors: 3.3 3.2 3.0
Addresses the following with respect      
a) litigants and witnesses: 2.9 3.4 3.2
b) lawyers: 2.2 3.2 3.0
c) court staff: 2.6 3.6 3.5
Attentiveness: 3.0 3.4 3.2
Timeliness of orders, judgments and decisions: 3.1 3.2 3.2
Demonstrates knowledge of substantive law and rules of evidence: 3.2 3.0 3.0
Quality of written decisions: 3.3 2.8 2.9
Shows willingness to ignore      
a) irrelevant considerations: 3.1 3.0 2.9
c) identity of lawyers or parties: 3.1 3.3 3.0
d) public pressure or outside interests: 3.6 3.4 3.2
Has ability to maintain control of courtroom: 3.6 3.5 3.4
Starts session on schedule and on time: 3.6 3.4 3.2
Shows an appropriate degree of preparedness: 3.2 3.2 3.1
Average Overall Rating: 3.1 3.2 3.1

 

  % Yes Answer averages for judges of this court averages of all judges
Regularly keeps sessions past 4 p.m.: 0 23 26
Allows lawyers to lobby their cases in chambers: 60 47 47
Is rigid follower of court-mandated time standards: 33 39 45
Behaves differently when cameras are in the courtroom: 0 21 24

 

Comments

1) Good lawyers love him. Judge Ford appreciates preparation, and hard work. It does not go unnoticed. If you are not prepared, he will be all over you, in a fair nice but firm way. Most would say he is not the most patient of judges but he never loses his temper. There is always a reason if he is critical.

2) Judge Ford is among the very best. Knows the law inside and out. Love his job. Enjoys arguments of counsel. Loves the give and take with counsel. But does not suffer fools. He has a very good sense of justice. Runs a great trial.

3) Hang in there, dont be intimidated by his inclination to rush you through your argument

4) Inpatient, not particularly well mannered, seems to have little concern over outcome of the case. Mostly concerned with moving the docket rather than making the right decision. Takes everything under advisement which is a clear indication he reads very little of the paper pleadings which can determine the outcome of the case.

5) Be ready to get criticized but dont take it too seriously. His impatience does not reflect itself in his decisions. Sometimes he gets irritated a little too easily.

6) Good Judge but can be irritable at times. Always prepared and knows his stuff.

7) Keep your head down and be prepared to keep your mouth shut.

8) Some men and women simply change once they are on the bench. They become consumed by a sense of power, they are insecure and express themselves by being arrogant, unreasonable and inaccessible. There have been some mistakes in appointments and this is certainly one such mistake, primarily with temporment.

9) Be on time. Be prepared.

10) Smart guy. On the bad side needs more patience with respect to lawyers schedules.

11) Be on time, and be prepared.

12) Judge Ford is bright, timely, and professional. That said, his civil decisions often lack a degree to detail appropriate to the nature of motions filed, especially summary judgment motions. While this lack of detail could be a function of how busy the court is, attorneys and litigants would be better served by a better approach to written decisions.



Leave a Reply